Discussion:
Exporting funcallable-standard-object on OpenMCL?
Vyacheslav Akhmechet
2008-03-24 20:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Is there a reason closer-mop doesn't provide compatibility for
funcallable-standard-object symbol on OpenMCL? The CCL package exports
it, but c2mop seems to exclude it on OpenMCL systems in
closer-mop/closer-mop-packages.lisp:19.

- Slava
Pascal Costanza
2008-03-24 20:14:59 UTC
Permalink
In the version in the darcs repository, this is already fixed.

I hope I find the time real soon now (tm) to release a new version of
Closer to MOP. Please bear with me...

Pascal
Post by Vyacheslav Akhmechet
Is there a reason closer-mop doesn't provide compatibility for
funcallable-standard-object symbol on OpenMCL? The CCL package exports
it, but c2mop seems to exclude it on OpenMCL systems in
closer-mop/closer-mop-packages.lisp:19.
- Slava
_______________________________________________
closer-devel mailing list
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/closer-devel
--
1st European Lisp Symposium (ELS'08)
http://prog.vub.ac.be/~pcostanza/els08/

Pascal Costanza, mailto:***@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Vyacheslav Akhmechet
2008-03-24 20:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pascal Costanza
In the version in the darcs repository, this is already fixed.
I hope I find the time real soon now (tm) to release a new version of
Closer to MOP. Please bear with me...
Ok. Thanks!
Marco Antoniotti
2008-05-06 14:22:24 UTC
Permalink
I told ya!

--
Marco Antoniotti
Sohail Somani
2008-05-26 23:54:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marco Antoniotti
I told ya!
--
Marco Antoniotti
Me too.
--
Sohail Somani
http://uint32t.blogspot.com
Loading...